Category: Majors

Roland Garros 2020, Women’s 1st Round Match Report: Sasnovich Gets the Last Word vs. Friedsam

Aliaksandra Sasnovich has been a steady performer on the WTA Tour, and on all surfaces, over the last three years. Two of her best results in her career came in 2018, first when she made the finals of the WTA Tour event in Brisbane, losing to Elina Svitolina, second when she stunned Petra Kvitova, one of the title favorites, in the opening round at Wimbledon and won two more matches to reach the fourth round, her best result in a Major. Sasnovich earned a career-high ranking of no.30 in that same year.

Though she eventually dropped below the top 100 in early 2020, she has had solid results since the tour resumed in August with Palermo Ladies Open, where she won six matches in a row as a qualifier to get to the quarterfinals before losing to top-seeded Petra Martic in two tiebreakers. Following a third-round loss to Yulia Putintseva at the US Open and another quarterfinal showing in Istanbul, Sasnovich arrived at Roland Garros ranked at no.96 in the WTA.

Sasnovich in January 2019, Brisbane International – (Photo: Bradley Kanaris — Getty Images AsiaPac)

Her first-round opponent Anna-Lena Friedsam of Germany, ranked no.104, suffered several early-round losses this year, except in Marseille in March where she played her second career WTA final, losing to Sofia Kenin in three sets. It was back in 2016 that Friedsam reached her career-best ranking of 45, before injuries (particularly her shoulder) sidelined her for extended periods of times. After dropping as low as outside the top 300 in 2018, her career finally took an upturn recently. She finds herself on the verge of entering top 100 again.

Sasnovich and Friedsam, both born in 1994 and only 7 weeks apart, had already faced each other at the start of the 2020 season in Shenzen where the Belarusian defeated Friedsam 6-2 6-3.

Being the second match scheduled on Court 13 – click here to read my analysis of the first match between Benjamin Bonzi and Emil Ruusuvuori –, the two women were spared the steady drizzle that Bonzi and Ruusuvuori had been subjected to during the first two sets of their match. Nonetheless, conditions still remained piss-poor with cold temperatures and winds causing havoc in terms of shot-production by both players.

There is always the case of one player adjusting a bit quicker to weather conditions than the other, which could be due to one player’s fundamentals being more adaptable to different conditions than that of the other player, or to that player’s ability to remain more cool-headed than the other under adverse conditions. In any case, that player in this match was Sasnovich who actually lost her serve to start the match by committing three unforced errors in the first game while slipping and sliding on the court (she smacked the bottom of her shoe in frustration with the racket to get the clay off on the fourth point of the match). She did adjust quickly though, and made only two unforced errors for the rest of the set!

She also began to use her drops shots frequently, probably realizing that testing Friedsam’s first-step quickness forward may be something she could exploit further. Despite a bad drop shot that cost her the 3-1 game on her serve, that tactic worked in her favor for the duration of the set, throwing Friedsam out of balance during rallies and not allowing the German to settle into a rhythm. Friedsam made 10 unforced errors from 1-0 up to 2-6 down and by the time she decided to increase the velocity on her shots in an attempt to regain some control in rallies, it was too late.

Friedsam, determined not to find herself in the same situation as in the first set, made an emphatic statement to her opponent in the first game of the second set, producing two forehand winners and two high-octane returns that forced Sasnovich into errors. It could have been costly had she missed them, but ti was the right choice at that moment. The alternative was to play cautious and avoid errors, only to allow Sasnovich to hold the reins during rallies thanks to her variety, including drop shots (read: a rehash of the first set).

Friedsam held serve to go up 2-0 and continued to pound away, especially with her forehand. While Sasnovich remained within distance when she held serve at 1-3, you could tell that she was beginning to fear her opponents’ accelerations. She was straining to place her shots deeper in order to avoid Friedsam’s winner attempts that were now landing in for the most part — because that is what happens when you commit to a plan and believe in it; you embrace the risk itself instead of fearing its consequences. As Sasnovich’s targets became more and more limited in her increased attempts to keep Friedsam behind the baseline and off balance, she began to commit errors of her own and got broken a second time. Sasnovich’s unforced-error count more than doubled in the second set (11) while Friedsam, despite playing riskier tennis, cut hers down to 5 for the set.

When the third set began, it was Sasnovich’s turn to solve problems and make the pendulum swing back her way. She achieved that goal in the first game already by shifting to higher gear on the pace of her baseline shots and stripping away Friedsam’s ability to take the initiative. In doing so, she made three forehand unforced errors in that first game, but she managed to hold serve by forcing Friedsam into errors of her own. The difference between what she did right there at the beginning of the third set, and what Friedsam had done earlier at the beginning of the second (they both successfully managed to shift the momentum) was that Friedsam aimed for direct winners or sought to squeeze rapid, forced errors out of Sasnovich, whereas Sasnovich, instead of looking to end the point quickly one way or the other, added spin (or slice) as well as pace, but hitting closer to the lines, with the ultimate goal being, I presume, to keep Friedsam on the move and make herself be the one to set the patterns in rallies again.

It worked.

As Friedsam found herself in more and more difficult positions, she could not generate the same pace and reproduce the precision she enjoyed in the second set, and errors began creeping into her game. Once Sasnovich went up a break 2-0, the match had a new outlook. It was now the Belarusian directing traffic again during rallies, using the full range of varieties in her arsenal, from topspin to drive accelerations, to slices on both wings (including that rare and wicked inside-out slice that she can hit on her forehand), mixed in with drops shots for good measure. As an example, I would recommend a rewatch of the 2-1 game if you have access, the breaking point of the final set in my view. It starts and ends with two drop-shot winners by Sasnovich, and then, there is the crucial 30-30 point in the middle, where Friedsam responds to the challenge put forth by Sasnovich by coming into the net on a great approach shot (exactly what she should do at that juncture of the match and on that point) that puts Sasnovich on a full run to her backhand side. Yet, the Belarusian, thanks to her agility, hits a tremendous two-handed down-the-line passing shot on the full run, earning the break point, and probably delivering a devastating blow to Friedsam’s charge to sink her teeth into the final set — the German had just broken serve to get back to 1-2 and was serving to equalize at 2-2.

With her timing derailed and down by a break again after the above sequence, Friedsam’s unforced-error count once again skyrocketed. She tried to counteract the effects by coming to the net more often, and had only limited success with it because Sasnovich simply did not provide the German with enough chances to consistently come forward.

Friedsam finished the final set with 11 unforced errors, whereas Sasnovich made only four more after the initial three in the first game, before she concluded the match with 6-2 2-6 6-3 win. It was not a spectacular performance by any means, but it was extremely efficient considering the dreadful circumstances created by not only the lack of spectators (Ct. 13 looked deserted for most of the match), but also the miserable weather conditions. In short, it was an extremely professional day at the office for Aliaksandra Sasnovich.

Her second-round opponent is Caroline Garcia who took out the 17th-seeded Anett Kontaveit in three sets and I feel certain that Sasnovich will have plenty of additional problem-solving to do against the Frenchwoman.

Click here to follow Mertov’s Tennis Desk on Twitter

Click here for the links to listen to Tennis with an Accent’s Roland Garros Preview podcast released on Saturday

Roland Garros 2020, Men’s 1st Round Match Report: Bonzi outlasts Ruusuvuori

First day of an atypical Roland Garros at an atypical time of the year, coupled with miserable weather conditions to start the day (read: cold, windy, with a steady drizzle), that alone should warn you to lower your expectations in terms of quality of play – understandably – and rather be prepared for the unexpected. It also meant that players who have been on site for a week, getting used to the conditions and surroundings, grinding through qualifying rounds with the new and supposedly heavier Wilson balls (as opposed to the Babolat ones of previous years), would have an advantage over those in the main draw who stepped on the court to play their first match at Roland Garros.

Thus, came victories by lucky loser Astra Sharma over Anna Blinkova, qualifier Kamilla Rakhimova over Shelby Rogers, qualifier Sebastian Korda over Andreas Seppi, and qualifier Jurij Rodionov over Jérémy Chardy, all within the first several hours of play at Roland Garros.

The Frenchman Benjamin Bonzi was yet another beneficiary of that trend on Court 13 when he defeated the 21-year-old Finnish player Emil Ruusuvuori, a promising up-and-comer, 6-2 6-4 4-6 6-4. Bonzi reached his highest ranking of 176 three years ago and has been outside the top 200 since January 2018. After a decent pre-Coronavirus start to 2020, the 24-year-old Bonzi showed up at Roland Garros qualifying rounds ranked 224 in the ATP and made his way to the main draw, getting an assist in his final qualifying round with a walk-over. To even get to that position, however, he had to save five match points in his 3-6 6-4 7-5 first-round victory over Zdeněk Kolář.

Bonzi in action during Roland Garros 2017 (Photo: Clive Brunskill — Getty Images Europe)

The career of Bonzi’s opponent has been on a brighter path than his as of late. Ruusuvuori entered the ATP’s top 200 a little over a year ago, and currently sitting at number 92, one below his career-high from last week.

That mattered little, however, as Ruusuvuori began experiencing all sorts of trouble from the gates, largely due to the conditions. Down a break immediately, he had a routine passing shot that he smashed in the net at 30-30 on Bonzi’s serve at 1-2 and followed it with a maligned drop shot attempt that let Bonzi confirm the break. By the time he got broken again to go down 1-4, Emil had already committed 6 unforced errors on his forehand, accompanying the three on his backhand wing. The fact that Ruusuvuori was unwilling to take his chances on short balls (examples: watch the first two points of the 1-4 game where he hits middle-of-the-court shots from way inside the baseline and backs up) and struggled to calibrate his sputtered timing on his ground strokes, while Bonzi kept putting pressure on him, only served to exacerbate the problem. I counted 6 points in which Emil had Benjamin on the run, with clear chances to attack on short balls, but chose to reset the rally by staying back.

By the time Bonzi, full of confidence at that point, held serve after a blank game (a forehand down-the-line winner to start it, and a cross-court one to end it) to pocket the first set 6-2, the otherwise-solid baseliner Ruusuvuori had committed 12 unforced errors**. Bonzi, for his part, enjoyed great success with his aggressive play, winning 8 out of 10 points on his approaches to the net.

**Side note: As usual for my match analyses, I count unforced errors myself and do not rely on the official stats.

The beginning of the second set saw the same pattern repeat itself. In the second point already, Ruusuvuori was almost at the service line and hit a solid shot, putting Bonzi on the run toward his backhand corner, but backed up to the baseline again, allowing Bonzi to get back in the rally and to produce a forehand winner to win the point. In the very next point, Bonzi approached with a backhand slice on the first chance he got and put the forehand volley away for a 15-40 lead, resulting in the break on the next point. That game was a microcosm of Ruusuvuori’s inability to adjust to the conditions, leading to questionable decision making, because decision-making takes a back seat when you are still preoccupied with cleaning up the mess on the basics.

Ruusuvuori did finally begin steadying the ship, starting with his service game at 1-3, but despite his effort, Bonzi protected his break lead all the way to the end of the set. Although he lost the set, Emil ended with a less “unpleasant” seven unforced-error tally compared to 12 in the first set. He also began to respond to his opponent’s relentless attacking by forcing Bonzi to hit lower volleys and producing clean passing shots. Bonzi’s success rate of 8 out 10 at the net in the first set plummeted to 5 out of 12 in the second and you could tell it was having an impact on him when, leading 4-3 and serving, he missed one approach due to hesitation at 15-0 and passed up a chance at 30-15. He lost both points, but still survived the game when Ruusuvuori committed two of his seven unforced errors after 30-30 to bail the Frenchman out.

Despite the improvement in the second set, Ruusuvuori still remained timid about approaching the net though, even when presented with the opportunity, passing up seven chances to put the heat on his opponent.

Having refilled the confidence tank nonetheless, cut down on errors (read: getting used to the conditions after two sets), and with his opponent now finding himself on the wrong side of the unforced-error race, Ruusuvuori built up a quick two-break lead in the third set. Bonzi put up a late charge that saw him climb back from 1-5 down to 4-5 and serve to equalize at 5-5. Ruusuvuori perhaps played his best return game of the match to break Bonzi back with a blank game and extend the match to a fourth set.

Emil appeared to have grabbed the momentum at the heels of that third set that marked a visible increase in the amount of errors committed by his opponent. Bonzi, to his credit, did not allow the slide to continue and held serve early to kickstart an entertaining fourth set where both players performed adequately – to use a cautionary term, considering the continuing wind and low temperatures – at the same time. This was the set that came down to a few key points.

The first one ended in Ruusuvuori’s favor when he hit a remarkable backhand passing shot at full stretch on the 30-30 point, when serving at 1-1. He followed it up with a backhand winner to go up 2-1. Ruusuvuori came through again when he faced a break point at 3-3, when he scraped through a long rally in which Bonzi was pushing him around, finally winning it when the Frenchman sailed a forehand deep.

Third time proved to be the charm for Bonzi who was progressively getting back to his ways of the first set, increasing the pressure on his opponent. At 4-4 he earned another break point when he attacked the net at deuce and produced a delightful half-volley pick-up. Although he could not capitalize on that break point, his opponent Ruusuvuori cracked in the next two points, erring on two routine approach shots to hand over the break to Bonzi.

Bonzi did not let his chance get away, seemingly knowing exactly what to do. He attacked the net four times in that contested last game alone. After earning his third match point after an overhead winner, he snatched his ticket to the second round when Ruusuvuori’s forehand return landed in the net.

Although this is not Bonzi’s first rodeo in the second round of a Major (as a wild-card entrant in Paris in 2017, he defeated Daniil Medvedev in the first round before losing to Ramos-Vinolas in the second), he couldn’t hide his excitement after the match, saying that he is “very happy” to have won and that it’s a “special” feeling to have the chance to play yet another match at Roland Garros. As for the miserable conditions, he confirmed that it was hard find any rhythm during points due to the wind and underlined that they played a significant portion of the match under the rain. He exclaimed: “We were soaked! The racket, the overgrips, all was wet […] it doesn’t help with the balls either, they become very heavy when they take water.” (Source: TennisActu)

Bonzi will next face Jannik Sinner, another up-and-comer, who eliminated the 11th-seeded David Goffin in three convincing sets, 7-5 6-0 6-3. This is also familiar ground for Sinner who reached the second round of the Australian Open earlier this year. However, it will be a career first in Majors for either man, when the winner of their match reaches the third round later this week.

Click here to follow Mertov’s Tennis Desk on Twitter

Click here for the links to listen to Tennis with an Accent’s Roland Garros Preview podcast released on Saturday

Roland Garros & Wimbledon Retro Podcasts

There has been no tennis since the break of Coronavirus but you can listen to four podcasts on Tennis with an Accent, with me as a guest with hosts Saqib Al and Matt Zemek, in which we took a retro approach to both Majors. Below are the links and synopses.

Roland Garros Podcasts

1) For Roland Garros, we “time-traveled” back to the Monday after the 1991 men’s tournament (meaning we do not know what the future may bring at that point, ha!) that saw Andre Agassi defeat Jim Courier in the final. We examined that final, along with the important events of the two weeks:

Men’s Tournament – Roland Garros 1991 Time-Travel

2) In our second Roland Garros podcast, the conversation focuses on the type of game that is suited to succeed on the clay of Roland Garros. Saqib and I delve into the evolution of classic styles from a pure baseliner to attacking players. Seles vs Graf battles from the 90’s are used as illustrations on how the playing trends kept evolving even from the baseline. Some iconic finals such as Lendl vs. McEnroe, Evert vs. Navratilova, and Courier vs Bruguera, among others, are covered. A lot of details are packed in this one.

Roland Garros Classic – Game trends, iconic matches, and more

Wimbledon Podcasts

1) 2006 Wimbledon – Time-Travel episode. Once again, Saqib and I beam back to the Monday after the 2006 men’s tournament and look back in detail to the first Federer vs. Nadal final on the grass courts of Wimbledon. We weigh in on the turn-around moments of the match and discuss its importance in the launching of the the rivalry (Nadal came in with a 6-1 lead in the head-to-head count). This also happened to be Andre Agassi’s last championships. We discuss his Wimbledon career in depth and where does he rank with some of the modern greats of the game. Plus, we talk about the potential up-and-comers (at the time) who performed well in the tournaments. Some names will be very familiar with today’s tennis fan.

Men’s Tournament – Wimbledon 2006 Time-Travel

2) I join Matt Zemek to chronicle women’s tennis at Wimbledon from the start of the Open Era in 1968 through the 1990s. Playing styles, surface speeds, racquet technology, and other changes over the course of Wimbledon history are weighed and evaluated in this study of women’s tennis at the All-England Club. The Martina Navratilova-Chris Evert rivalry is a natural centerpiece of this discussion, but don’t forget about Margaret Court versus Billie Jean King in the early 1970s, or Steffi Graf versus multiple challengers in the 1990s, and the 2000s with Venus Williams taking the spotlight. Many players mentioned and notes discussed on the tournament’s evolution.

Wimbledon Women’s Open Era Revisited

Note: The above podcasts and all other Tennis with an Accent podcasts are also available on Apple and Google Podcasts.

Click here to follow Mertov’s Tennis Desk on Twitter

US Open Men’s Preview: Anyone (non-Big 3) Ready to Step Forward?

Nuance: I am not talking only talking about “stepping forward” in the figurative sense in this piece I wrote for Tennis with an Accent on the upcoming US Open men’s competition. Can anyone get past the Big 3 and lift the trophy?

Click the link for my preview: US Open Men – Anyone Ready to Step Forward?

Click here to follow Mertov’s Tennis Desk on Twitter

Wimbledon Semis, Federer vs Nadal: Roger Holds Down the Fort

Roger Federer needed a near-perfect performance on Friday’s semifinal match to defeat an in-form Rafael Nadal on Centre Court at Wimbledon. Read my post-match analysis on Tennis with an Accent by clicking on the link below:

For Federer, Near-Perfect is Good Enough

Federer hitting a drive backhand return in practice at Wimbledon

Click here to follow Mertov’s Tennis Desk on Twitter

Match Report, Wimbledon Semifinal: Simona Halep vs Elina Svitolina

Sometimes, it’s all in how it begins rather than how it ends. One got off the gates (only slightly) better than the other and kept riding, and riding, and riding.

Clink on the link below to read my post-match analysis on Simona Halep’s victory over Elina Svitolina in the semis of Wimbledon today on Tennis with an Accent.

Match report: Simona Halep (7) – Elina Svitolina (8)

Photo: Getty Images Europe

Click here to follow Mertov’s Tennis Desk on Twitter

Navigation